Your Ad Here
"Hollywood Republican Movies is an interactive site.  Once a review has been posted about a particular film, any reader can write another review of the film as a comment.  This can be done by clicking on the stars icon for that review.  This will also help determine what the average number of stars each film will be awarded."

Prohibition: How liberals love to mess with our lives

prohibition“People think of Prohibition as a conservative movement, but not at all. It was a movement that was embraced by progressives,” says historian Wiliiam Leuchtenburg in Ken Burns and Lynn Novick’s riveting, rollicking, infuriating and very contemporary documentary “Prohibition.”

“Prohibition,” a three-part miniseries that airs starting tonight on PBS and comes out on DVD and Blu-Ray this week, has many lessons to teach us about such antiquated, 1920s-era ideas as federal overreach, unfunded mandates to states, runaway taxation, a belief that great political leaders can accelerate human progress, crony capitalism, and of course the dire need of Washington to take steps to improve the lot of the poor and the children.

n other words, “Prohibition” is, to an almost mischievous extent, an investigative report about 2011.

Historian Catherine Gilbert Murdock, who provides a feminist voice to Burns and Novick’s film, says, of the times that gave rise to the dry movement, “There is a belief in human perfectibility — that humans can be perfect and alcohol is the fly in the ointment. You could have a perfect marriage if it weren’t for alcohol. You could you have a perfect husband if it weren’t for alcohol. You could have a perfect community if it weren’t for alcohol.”

And if you want perfection, who better to supply it than the federal government?

The temperance movement began in the 1840s in response to a real and growing problem — and culminated in the 1920s with a law that utterly failed to ameliorate that problem, at great cost, while giving rise to many seemingly unrelated but in fact entirely predictable woes.

The many flaws in progressivism — the top-down, big-government, high-taxation model that seeks controls for benevolent reasons yet invariably falls prey to corruption — are as blatant today as they are in Burns and Novick’s film. Even the evangelist movement that underlay the temperance /abstinence movement has persisted virtually unchanged — except now the literal evangelists are sad and comical figures with no influence on anybody except their marginalized congregations. In the 21st century, the real action, the influential leaders with immense followings whose numbers include the most powerful members of the media, are in eco-vangelism.

“Prohibition” is a virtual checklist of everything people dislike about DC today:

Read more:

Your Ad Here

2 Comments for “Prohibition: How liberals love to mess with our lives”

  1. Kathryn says:

    I definitely see the bias in this documentary. I recognized the name of Ruth Proskauer Smith from reading Dr. Bernard Nathanson’s “Aborting America.” She was a founding member of NARAL. It’s as if everyone involved in his project has a liberal bias. In this, the pain that grew the temperance movement was completely dismissed. In reality, real people, women and children suffered greatly from a father who had spent the paycheck, become violent and let them starve and languish. Yet these documentarians, likely from privileged backgrounds, act as if these people’s lives didn’t matter-that they were just a bunch of religious hypocrites and the reason scumbags like Al Capone flourished.

  2. One of the tests of leadership is the ability to recognize a difficulty before now you have an emergency.
    There is no time for cut-and-dried monotony. There is certainly time for work. And time for love. That leaves not one other time!

Leave a Comment